California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year  2017-18

State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9


TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 2 SAN FRANCISCO BAY

GROUP: 
TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 2
MEASURE: 
ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

Targets Achieved:
• = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above

REGIONAL BOARD TARGET RESULTS  - Data last updated on: 

San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board Performance Summary1
Percentage of Targets Met
Area: 4520 square miles Budget: $25,697,771 Staff: 101.7
Permitting 100% • Inspections 90% • Others 100% •
1Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met.
 
Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning
Program Budget: $2,273,989 Program Staff: 10.60
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed 4 4 100% •
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted 2 2 100% •
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted 0 0  
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations provided
NPDES Wastewater
Program Budget: $2,452,627 Program Staff: 11.30
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 11 12 109% •
Major Individual Facilities Inspected 27 27 100% •
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 1 1 100% •
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected 5 5 100% •
Minor General Facilities Inspected 0 3  
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations provided
NPDES Stormwater
Program Budget: $2,214,601 Program Staff: 10.60
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections) 50 59 118% •
Construction Inspections 74 87 118% •
Industrial Inspections 69 108 157% •
Regional Considerations: Factors affecting available staff time for NPDES municipal stormwater work included requirements for information submittal from the Commission on State Mandates, which consumed more than 4 months of staff time, reducing the time available for other activities.
Waste Discharge to Land - Wastewater
Program Budget: $766,446 Program Staff: 2.60
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections 12 10 83% •
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated 3 2 67% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Land Disposal
Program Budget: $985,129 Program Staff: 3.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Landfill Individual Permits Updated 3 4 133% •
Landfill Inspections 40 46 115% •
All Other Individual Permits Updated 2 2 100% •
All Other Inspections 16 7 44% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.)  
Program Budget: $0 Program Staff: 0.00
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections 7 5 71% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Timber Harvest (Forestry)  
Program Budget: $0 Program Staff: 0.00
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Timber Harvest Inspections 2 6 300% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Enforcement
Program Budget: $370,881 Program Staff: 1.90
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery 100% 100% 100% •
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual 0 0         •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Cleanup
Program Budget: $3,538,437 Program Staff: 15.00
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation 5 11 220% •
New Cleanup Sites Moved Into Active Remediation 20 40 200% •
Cleanup Sites Closed 35 43 123% •
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation 5 10 200% •
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed 35 31 89% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for the fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th) to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed before November 4, 2014 and may not reflect data input after that period.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target circles: • = Less than 60% of target met
    • = Target met between 60% and 80%
    • = Target met at 80% or above.
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions, amendments or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Regional Considerations provided in tables above under each program section.