 
 
      
      
      
      
       
       
      
      
      SWAMP - California Aquatic Bioassessment Workshop 2003
CALIFORNIA AQUATIC BIOASSESSMENT WORKGROUP - 10TH ANNUAL MEETING 
      December 2-4, 2003 
      Sacramento, California
      DECEMBER 2, 2003 PRESENTATIONS
DECEMBER 3, 2003 PRESENTATIONS
| Item # | Presentation | 
|---|---|
| 11. | Who is FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) & Why Do Bugs Matter?; Russ Kanz, State Water Board (State Water Resources Control Board) SWRCB | 
| 12. | Effects of Hydropower Production on the Health of Aquatic Ecosystems in California | 
| 13-14. | Southern California Coastal Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI); Aquatic Bioassessment Laboratory, Water Pollution Control Laboratory, CA Dept. of Fish & Game (CDFG), CSU (California State University), Chico | 
| 15. | Development, Evaluation, & Application of a RIVPACS-type Predictive Model for Assessing the Biological Condition of Streams in Region 5 (California) National Forests; by Charles Hawkins, Western Center for Monitoring & Assessment of Freshwater Ecosystems, Utah State University & USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture), Region 5 (California) of the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) | 
| 16-18. | Building of the Western Pilot EMAP & Enhancing State Water Quality Monitoring to Better Address Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution in California; Region 9, US EPA & SWRCB | 
| 19. | California’s Coastal EMAP Program; by Stephen B. Weisberg, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), Environmental Monitoring & Assessment Project (EMAP) | 
| 20. | Wetland Assessment in California: Context & Progress Towards Method Development; SCCWRP, San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), CA Coastal Commission (CCC), US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9 | 
DECEMBER 4, 2003 PRESENTATIONS
| Item # | Presentation | 
|---|---|
| 21. | Not Available | 
| 22. | The Biological Condition Gradient; by Michael T. Barbour, TetraTech, Adapted from Susan Davies’ (ME DEP) Presentation | 
| 23A. | Streamlining the UAA (Use Attainability Analyses) Process, by TetraTech | 
| 23B. | Recommendations & Benefits: Tiered Aquatic Life Use Framework (TALU), Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) & California Aquatic Life Uses | 
| 24. | Not Available | 
| 25. | California’s Aquatic Life Beneficial Uses: Current Status & Novel Approaches; by Bill Reeves, SWRCB, DWQ | 
| 26. | Using Biological Assessments & Biocriteria in Water Quality Standards – The Tiered Aquatic Life Use Framework (TALU); by William Swieteik, US EPA | 
(Page last updated 4/30/18)
Water is a precious resource in California, and maintaining its quality is of utmost importance to safeguard the health of the public and the environment.



