Hearings Program

CITY OF DAVIS / CITY OF WOODLAND: WATER RIGHTS APPLICATIONS HEARING

List of Exhibits

  • Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency, City of Davis, City of Woodland, University of California, Davis
  • California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

    Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency, City of Davis, City of Woodland, University of California, Davis

    Exhibit No. Description
    Written testimony for James Yost
    James A. Yost. P.E. Resume
    Excerpts from April 2007 DWWSP Draft EIR, pages 5-7, 5-8, 5-9, and 5-54
    Historic Davis Well Problems
    Historic Woodland Well Problems
    City of Woodland NPDES Waste Discharge Permit, dated February 5, 2009
    City of Davis NPDES Waste Discharge Permit, dated September 23, 2010
    Davis and Woodland Summary of Compliance Schedules and/or Time Schedule Orders for Selenium, Salinity, and Boron
    Davis-Woodland Water Supply Project – Evaluation of Funding Technical Memorandum, August 2007
    Excerpts from October 2007 DWWSP Final EIR, pages 3-9 through 3-11
    City of Davis Resolution No. 10-183, Series 2010, filed with SWRCB on December 14, 2010
    City of Woodland Resolution No. 5150, filed with SWRCB on December 14, 2010
    City of Davis Notice of Assignment, filed with SWRCB on December 14, 2010
    City of Woodland Notice of Assignment, filed with SWRCB on December 14, 2010
    Historical Term 91 Days
    City of Davis Time Schedule Order No. R5-2010-0098
    Testimony of Walter Bourez, P.E.
    Resume of Walter Bourez, III
    Existing Conditions and Existing Conditions With Project CalSim II Modeling
    Cumulative Conditions and Cumulative Conditions Without Project CalSim II Modeling
    Percent of time surplus is expected to be available if SWRCB adopts Delta Flow Criteria as requirements
    Historical photographs of Sacramento River and Sutter Basin, March 1940 and Fremont Weir and Sacramento River, Feb. 20, 2004
    PG&E Powerhouses Along Pit River with Associated Water Rights
    PG&E Water Rights for Power Generation Along Pit River
    Water Rights at Shasta Dam for Consumptive Users and Power Uses
    Water Rights at Oroville Dam for Consumptive Users and Power Uses
    Water Rights at Folsom Dam for Consumptive Users and Power Uses
    Sacramento Valley and Delta Watershed Unimpaired Flow and Depletion Bar Graphs
    Testimony of Dr. Charles H. Hanson
    Resume of Dr. Charles H. Hanson
    Proposed Intake Location
    Conceptual diagram of on-bank intake structure
    Examples of fish inhabiting the Sacramento River
    Photographs of common fish inhabiting the Sacramento River in vicinity of proposed DWWSP diversion
    Bay-Delta downstream of proposed project locations
    Average monthly water diversions (TAF) at the proposed project
    Seasonal distribution of salmonids in the Sacramento River
    Excerpts from April 2007 DWWSP Draft EIR, pp. 3-16 to 3.6-27 and 3.6-46 to 3.6-54
    Applicants’ protest-dismissal agreement with CDFG
    Summary of difference in average monthly flow (cfs) at Freeport with and without proposed project
    Average monthly percentage change in Sacramento River flows at Freeport with and without the proposed project
    Average annual Delta flows, With-Project Conditions compared to Existing Conditions
    Average annual Delta flows, Cumulative Conditions compared to Cumulative Conditions without Project
    Average monthly percentage change in Delta outflow with and without the proposed project

    California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

    Exhibit No. Description
    Chris Shutes CV
    Chris Shutes Testimony
    DWR Notice for application 5629
    DWR Petition for extension of time 5630
    El Dorado State Filings
    CVP Notice of petition for extension of time 12721 et al.
    CVP Petition for extension of time supplement 12721 et al.
    SFCWA Letter to Hoppin October1, 2010
    Modeling Appendix B, State and federal contractors letter to Hoppin October 1, 2010
    MWH memorandum to Mrowka, water availability
    GCID letter to BDCP re: modeling for proposed operations
    NORCAL Coalition letter to BDCP
    Freeman analysis, Feather run-off Climate Change
    OCAP BA 2008, Appendix D
     CalSim-II model
    Letter Deputy Director Water Rights, to CSPA July 16, 2010
    CSPA protest application 30358 1994
    CSPA Letter to Herrera, State Board February 3, 2010
    CSPA Request for hearing August 16, 2010
    Bill Jennings CV
    Bill Jennings Testimony
    Moyle, Remarks to NRC, January 26, 2010
    DFG Fall Midwater Trawl data
    Swanson, C. The Bay Institute, ppt. Sustainable Water and Environmental Management January 26,2010
    G. Fred Lee comments on SWRCB’s Flow Criteria Feb. 11, 2010
    Edmonston, information submitted to Congressman Engle. October 27, 1951
    Opinion of Attorney Walter M. Gleason, submitted to Senator Teal, October 28,1960
    Bulletin No. 76, Delta Water Facilities
    Pie Chart, DRAFT California Water Boards Strategic Plan Update 2008-2012, May 30, 2008
    California Water Plan Update 2009, River Indices
    SWRCB to Delta Vision, Water Rights Within the Bay/Delta Watershed, 9/26/2008
    Musings on a model: CalSim –II 2005
    State Water Resources Control Board,
    Development of Flow Criteria for the Sacramento – San Joaquin Delta Ecosystem, August 3, 2010
    State Water Resources Control Board,
    Water Rights Decision 1641
    Draft State Water Resources Control Board, Water Rights Decision 1630
    State Water Resources Control Board,
    Water Rights Decision 1485
    Draft State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Control Plan for Salinity, 1988
    State Water Resources Control Board,
    Water Rights Order 89-8
    State Water Resources Control Board, 303(d) Combined List (combines 4a, 4b, and 5).  2010
    Appendix B Modeling Results and Water Demand
    Davis-Woodland Water Supply Project, Draft Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse Number 2006042175
    A. Close et al, A Strategic Review of CALSIM II and its Use for Water Planning, Management and Operations in Central California, December 4, 2003